Friday, 15 August 2008
General Motors To Audit Health Coverage Eligibility Of Hourly Workers' Dependents
General Motors recently announced it will conduct an audit to determine whether hourly workers' dependents enrolled in the automaker's health plans ar eligible for coverage, the Detroit Free Press reports. GM is attempting to reduce the $4.6 billion it spends p.a. on health care by removing ineligible dependents (Detroit Free Press, 8/13).
This is not the first health benefits audit GM has conducted, according to the Wall Street Journal. However, a GM voice said this audit volition be more extensive than previous efforts. GM notified its 67,000 hourly workers that they throw until Aug. 20 to voluntarily get rid of dependents world Health Organization are ineligible from their health plans. The carmaker last class spent $1.3 billion on health care for hourly workers and their dependents. Workers who are found to have standard health benefits for ineligible dependents power be compulsory to reimburse the company, the spokesperson said.
According to HRAdvance, removing ineligible dependents can redeem an employer between 2% and 5%. GM estimates that 5% to 10% of dependents enrolled in its wellness plans ar ineligible. Paul Fronstin, music director of health research and educational programs for the Employee Benefit Research Institute, said that health benefits audits are becoming more than common as employers search to boil down growing health care expenditure (Terlep, Wall Street Journal, 8/13).
Reprinted with kind license from hTTP://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can vista the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email speech at hTTP://www.kaisernetwork.
Thursday, 7 August 2008
Full Battle Rattle - movie review
The  electric potential for wartime satire is almost unbearably high in the background for Tony  
Gerber  and Jesse  Moss's  documentary Full  Battle  Rattle,  a fact which regrettably may 
sustain left them unable to do very much more to capitalize on their matter, assuming that 
it would provide the context and satire for itself. This  can occur sometimes to 
the best of filmmakers, where they become most paralyzed by the wide-cut weight of what they're 
beholding. The  better ones learn how to moil deeper, those on the lower end of the 
scale skate along the surface. Gerber  and Moss  are the latter.
After  introductory training merely before they are deployed to Iraq,  many fresh-minted American  
soldiers have some other stop to make. Somewhere  in the Mojave  desolate, the Army  runs 
an Iraqi  Potemkin  village where trainees ar sent to take part in tierce weeks of 
simulated missions, complete with Arabic-speaking  villagers and insurgents who like to 
stir up trouble. Looking  like a knocked-together film place, the aggregation of dun-colored 
buildings called Medina  Wasl  also serves as a home to the people who ar "playing" 
the villagers. That  many of the villagers are Iraqi  exiles, and probably making a better 
and safer living than most of their countrymen, brings a bittersweet fucus serratus to their 
scenes, which provide some of the only elements of humanity in this otherwise colourless
 and dull film.
It  is indeed a surreal sight to witness American  soldiers in wide gear roar into 
Medina  Wasl  and parlaying with shouting and gesticulating actors in order to maintain 
the greenwich Village from devolving into finish anarchy. But  Full  Battle  Rattle  takes the integral 
strangeness of that imaginativeness as a given and never quite expands on it, flunk to crowd 
the story outside of the filmmakers' comfort zone. Given  the infamous want of grooming 
displayed by the Pentagon  in the planning for the Iraq  invasion, it represents a quantum 
shift in scheme that such a specific training run aground would even be developed (a 
exchangeable camp was created for jungle warfare training during Vietnam).  But  you wouldn't 
know the import of this from Gerber  and Moss'  feeler, which brings in no outside 
viewpoints or historical perspectives and instead sticks with the people living and 
working in Medina  Wasl.
Even  with the subjects it does interview, Full  Battle  Rattle  comes up short, in that it 
rarely seems to ask any of the tougher questions, peculiarly to those in unvarying. 
Only  a very few officers talk at length, offering unilluminating platitudes for 
the most part. The  most glaring oversight, even so (and one that seems likely to have 
been a compromise in order of magnitude to secure access in the low place) is the about complete 
deficiency of discussion with the frontline soldiers being put through the training. One  
would take that the viewpoints of those for whom the whole compound has been constructed 
would have been of interest.
Given  disturbingly more than screen time are the American  veterans of the Iraq  scrap, 
who have come to Medina  Wasl  to use their fight experience in order to play the 
bad guys. Somewhat
